Publication:
Should Peer E-Comments Replace Traditional Peer Comments?

datacite.subject.fos oecd::Social sciences::Economics and Business
dc.contributor.author Pham Vu Phi Ho
dc.contributor.author Luong Thi Kim Phung
dc.contributor.author Tran Thi Thuy Oanh
dc.contributor.author Nguyen Quang Giao
dc.date.accessioned 2022-11-02T02:59:29Z
dc.date.available 2022-11-02T02:59:29Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.description.abstract Many studies in literature have compared peer e-feedback/comments to traditional peer feedback/comments to see whether one medium of providing feedback should replace the other. However, few studies investigated to see whether two modes of commentary activities positively affected the students’ writing quality, instead of just comparing one to another. The literature failed to investigate the extent to which each had effects on students’ writing skills. The purpose of this study was to fill this gap. The current study employed quasi-experimental research with control and experimental groups to study the issues. Seventy-two native Vietnamese students from two intact classes at Ho Chi Minh City University of Science who had ever obtained this kind of training activities participated in the study. The training procedures for both groups were similar except one conducted face-to-face peer comments on papers and the other on Facebook social network. Data collection was from pre- vs. post-tests rated by inter-raters and analyzed by the t-tests of SPSS software. The findings of the study revealed that peer commentary activities of both groups had significant impacts on students’ writing quality; however, the peer e-comments outperformed the traditional peer comments.
dc.identifier.doi 10.29333/iji.2020.13120a
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.vlu.edu.vn:443/handle/123456789/642
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.relation.ispartof International Journal of Instruction
dc.relation.issn 1694-609X
dc.relation.issn 1308-1470
dc.subject peer e-feedback/comments
dc.subject face-to-face peer comments
dc.subject writing quality
dc.subject traditional peer comments
dc.subject Facebook-based peer comments
dc.title Should Peer E-Comments Replace Traditional Peer Comments?
dc.type journal-article
dspace.entity.type Publication
oaire.citation.issue 1
oaire.citation.volume 13
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
AS317.pdf
Size:
724.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: